On 31/10/2012 16:18, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Daniel J Blueman
<dan...@numascale-asia.com> wrote:
As the AMD64 last-level-cache ID is 16-bits and federated systems
eg using Numascale's NumaConnect/NumaChip can have more than 255 memory
controllers, use 16-bits to store the ID.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <dan...@numascale-asia.com>
---
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 18d404a..9920dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static u64 get_error_address(struct mce *m)
struct amd64_pvt *pvt;
u64 cc6_base, tmp_addr;
u32 tmp;
- u8 mce_nid, intlv_en;
+ u16 mce_nid, intlv_en;
Is the change of intlv_en to u16 intentional?
I assume its not, because...
It's unintentional. Elsewhere, intlv_en is declared as unsigned, so
perhaps that should be cleaned up later too.
I'll issue an updated patch.
if ((addr & GENMASK(24, 47)) >> 24 != 0x00fdf7)
return addr;
@@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static int f1x_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt,
unsigned range,
u8 channel;
bool high_range = false;
- u8 node_id = dram_dst_node(pvt, range);
+ u16 node_id = dram_dst_node(pvt, range);
u8 intlv_en = dram_intlv_en(pvt, range);
... here you keep it at u8.
u32 intlv_sel = dram_intlv_sel(pvt, range);
@@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static int toggle_ecc_err_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u8 nid, bool on)
+static int toggle_ecc_err_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u16 nid, bool on)
{
cpumask_var_t cmask;
int cpu;
@@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ static int toggle_ecc_err_reporting(struct ecc_settings
*s, u8 nid, bool on)
return 0;
}
-static bool enable_ecc_error_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u8 nid,
+static bool enable_ecc_error_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u16 nid,
struct pci_dev *F3)
{
bool ret = true;
@@ -2396,7 +2396,7 @@ static bool enable_ecc_error_reporting(struct
ecc_settings *s, u8 nid,
return ret;
}
-static void restore_ecc_error_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u8 nid,
+static void restore_ecc_error_reporting(struct ecc_settings *s, u16 nid,
struct pci_dev *F3)
{
u32 value, mask = 0x3; /* UECC/CECC enable */
@@ -2435,7 +2435,7 @@ static const char *ecc_msg =
"'ecc_enable_override'.\n"
" (Note that use of the override may cause unknown side effects.)\n";
-static bool ecc_enabled(struct pci_dev *F3, u8 nid)
+static bool ecc_enabled(struct pci_dev *F3, u16 nid)
{
u32 value;
u8 ecc_en = 0;
@@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static int amd64_init_one_instance(struct pci_dev *F2)
struct mem_ctl_info *mci = NULL;
struct edac_mc_layer layers[2];
int err = 0, ret;
- u8 nid = get_node_id(F2);
+ u16 nid = get_node_id(F2);
ret = -ENOMEM;
pvt = kzalloc(sizeof(struct amd64_pvt), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2647,7 +2647,7 @@ err_ret:
static int __devinit amd64_probe_one_instance(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id
*mc_type)
{
- u8 nid = get_node_id(pdev);
+ u16 nid = get_node_id(pdev);
struct pci_dev *F3 = node_to_amd_nb(nid)->misc;
struct ecc_settings *s;
int ret = 0;
@@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ static void __devexit amd64_remove_one_instance(struct
pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct amd64_pvt *pvt;
- u8 nid = get_node_id(pdev);
+ u16 nid = get_node_id(pdev);
struct pci_dev *F3 = node_to_amd_nb(nid)->misc;
struct ecc_settings *s = ecc_stngs[nid];
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Daniel J Blueman
Principal Software Engineer, Numascale Asia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
