On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 06:18:13PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:05 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: "Alexis R. Cortes" <alexis.cor...@ti.com> > > > > commit 470809741a28c3092279f4e1f3f432e534d46068 upstream. > > > > This minor change adds a new system to which the "Fix Compliance Mode > > on SN65LVPE502CP Hardware" patch has to be applied also. > > > > System added: > > Vendor: Hewlett-Packard. System Model: Z1 > [...] > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > > @@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ static bool compliance_mode_recovery_tim > > > > if (strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z420") || > > strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z620") || > > - strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z820")) > > + strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z820") || > > + strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z1")) > > This will also match any future models with extra digits after the '1'. > It might be worth using a slightly stricter match.
Hmm, Ben has a point. We don't want to have the timer run on a machine that really doesn't need the quirk, or we impact battery life. Alex, can you make a new patch that fixes this? Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
