On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote: > I guess it would improve system performance very well. > But as I wrote down in description, downside of the patch is that we have to > age anon lru although we don't have swap. But gain via the patch is bigger > than > loss via aging of anon lru when memory pressure happens. I don't see other > downside > other than it. What do you think about it? > (I didn't implement anon lru aging in case of no-swap but it's trivial > once we decide)
I am a bit confused like some of the others as to why this patch is necessary since we already have DONT_NEED. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
