On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
> > good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
>
> I don't doubt there are. But we've only experienced one problem
> between 3.0.36-rt58 and 3.0.48-rt72. Indeed, it might be easier to
> evaluate the risk if all the changelogs were readily available. So
> far, however, we haven't discovered any other issues that give us any
> concerns.
>
> > Your risk assessment is definitley interesting.
>
> We have specifically tested 3.0.36-rt58 for performance in our
> application. Moving to 3.0.48-rt72 poses risk about whether would
> still be able to meet our performance requirements. And with regard
> to stability, the only issue we've had since our earlier moved to
> 3.0.36-rt58 was the netfilter problem. We initially only saw the
> problem on PPP related interfaces, so we reverted to 3.0.3 (non-rt)
> for PPP related issues.
>
> Now, if you think there are some issues that should raise eyebrows, or
> can point me to a list of changelogs, I'd be happy to evaluate them.
git log v3.0.36-rt58..3.0.48-rt72
That's what a source version control system is designed for AFAICT
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
