On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:20:27AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >>> On 02.11.12 at 15:01, Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > >> >>> Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>> > > >> >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> >> >>> Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>> > > >> >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in > > >> >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || > > >> >> >defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST) > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but > > >> >> >for > > >> >> >now we need it. > > >> >> > > >> >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been > > >> >> the better one (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you > > >> >> suggest > > >> >> above). > > >> > > > >> >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what > > >> >you submitted and would also fix this build error. How about using it > > >> >instead? > > >> > > >> Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or > > >> incremental > > > one? > > > > > > Greg will probably want an incremental patch, because the original has > > > already been merged. > > > > I actually sent both (the incremental as attachment - I hope that's > > going to be acceptable to him) in a submission earlier today. > > Ah, okay, good. > > Greg, whichever version you take, you can add: > > Acked-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Thanks for that, as you guessed, I have to take the incremental one as the first is already applied. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
