On 11/02/12 22:45, Jeff Moyer wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c index 2936b44..4db6973 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c @@ -173,16 +173,20 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(host_cmd_pool_mutex); * NULL on failure */ static struct scsi_cmnd * -scsi_pool_alloc_command(struct scsi_host_cmd_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_mask) +scsi_pool_alloc_command(struct scsi_host_cmd_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_mask, + int node) { struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;- cmd = kmem_cache_zalloc(pool->cmd_slab, gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask); + cmd = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pool->cmd_slab, + gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO, + node); if (!cmd) return NULL; - cmd->sense_buffer = kmem_cache_alloc(pool->sense_slab, - gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask); + cmd->sense_buffer = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pool->sense_slab, + gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO, + node);
It's not clear to me why __GFP_ZERO is added to the allocation flags ? Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
