On 11/06/2012 09:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > From: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > > The <*/gpio.h> includes are updated again: now we need to account > for the problem introduced by commit: > 595679a8038584df7b9398bf34f61db3c038bfea > "gpiolib: fix up function prototypes etc" > > Actually we need static inlines in include/asm-generic/gpio.h > as well since we may have GPIOLIB but not PINCTRL. > > And we need to keep the static inlines in <linux/gpio.h> > but here for the !CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO case, and then we > may as well throw in a few warnings like the other > prototypes there, if someone would have the bad taste > of compiling without GENERIC_GPIO even.
Hmm. Is there way to avoid the duplication of the dummy implementations? Having a prototype and a truly dummy implementation in one place, but a WARNing/failing dummy implementation elsewhere, seems like it'll cause issues. Does this patch mean the previous series causes "git bisect" failures? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/