On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 21:57 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>  From: Jiang Liu <jiang....@huawei.com>
> 
> On error recovery path in function vfio_create_group(), it should
> unregister the IOMMU notifier for the new VFIO group. Otherwise it may
> cause invalid memory access later when handling bus notifications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

This patch and patch 6/6 looks like good vfio fixes regardless of how we
tackle the driver binding problem.  Please submit them separately.
Thanks for the patches, I look forward to a solution here.  Thanks,

Alex

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index 17830c9..3359ec2 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ static void vfio_container_put(struct vfio_container 
> *container)
>       kref_put(&container->kref, vfio_container_release);
>  }
>  
> +static void vfio_group_unlock_and_free(struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> +     mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> +     /*
> +      * Unregister outside of lock.  A spurious callback is harmless now
> +      * that the group is no longer in vfio.group_list.
> +      */
> +     iommu_group_unregister_notifier(group->iommu_group, &group->nb);
> +     kfree(group);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
>   */
> @@ -229,8 +240,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct 
> iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  
>       minor = vfio_alloc_group_minor(group);
>       if (minor < 0) {
> -             mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -             kfree(group);
> +             vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>               return ERR_PTR(minor);
>       }
>  
> @@ -239,8 +249,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct 
> iommu_group *iommu_group)
>               if (tmp->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
>                       vfio_group_get(tmp);
>                       vfio_free_group_minor(minor);
> -                     mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -                     kfree(group);
> +                     vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>                       return tmp;
>               }
>       }
> @@ -249,8 +258,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct 
> iommu_group *iommu_group)
>                           group, "%d", iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
>       if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
>               vfio_free_group_minor(minor);
> -             mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -             kfree(group);
> +             vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>               return (struct vfio_group *)dev; /* ERR_PTR */
>       }
>  
> @@ -274,16 +282,7 @@ static void vfio_group_release(struct kref *kref)
>       device_destroy(vfio.class, MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.devt), group->minor));
>       list_del(&group->vfio_next);
>       vfio_free_group_minor(group->minor);
> -
> -     mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Unregister outside of lock.  A spurious callback is harmless now
> -      * that the group is no longer in vfio.group_list.
> -      */
> -     iommu_group_unregister_notifier(group->iommu_group, &group->nb);
> -
> -     kfree(group);
> +     vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_group_put(struct vfio_group *group)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to