On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 07:28:53PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> cramfs is nice but still read-only at the moment... You might be able
> to get away with stacking ramfs on top of that.
What is easier because this ...
> If not, it shouldn't be hard to modify cramfs so that it allows
> fs modifications... just stick the updated pages in RAM until
> the file is unlinked or the fs is unmounted.
... will lead into problems accounting available space on the fs,
since openers don't expect that they cannot write to a file
anymore, just because we we are out of RAM for backing the
writes.
I think unionfs will care for this kind of problems once we have
it implemented in an official tree.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
