On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> > wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig >> index 366ec06..9bc00e7 100644 >> --- a/arch/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/Kconfig >> @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ config ARCH_WANT_OLD_COMPAT_IPC >> select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION >> bool >> >> +config ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS >> + bool >> + help >> + An architecture should select this if it cannot (or will not) >> + implement virt_to_bus(). All new architectures should probably >> + select this. > > Don't we typically put the burden of selecting Kconfig flags for deprecated > features on the existing architectures that provide the deprecated features? > > I.e. shouldn't it be ARCH_HAS_VIRT_TO_BUS, selected by the architectures > that need it, instead?
I like this idea. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
