On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 November 2012 20:57, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> Well, the prep_* should assign the value due to changes of check in the >> dwc_descriptor_complete. Otherwise we will potentially skip some >> important piece of code. > > What i meant to say was, set_runtime_config() must have already done this > part.
On one hand it is true. On the other - *_prep* functions use explicitly passed parameter. I doubt there is a consistency between value in slave config passed via dwc_control and value passed as explicit function parameter. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
