Alan Cox wrote:
> > So the ACPI function of the PIIX4 is now being given
> > IRQ 9. I don't want this. I was using IRQ 9 for a
> > PCMCIA device.
>
> It was always being given IRQ 9, now we correctly handle this.
Okay, but. IRQs are scarce. With previous kernels I was able
to use IRQ 9 for other things without any obvious problems.
Perhaps this is only because I don't have ACPI support enabled.
Still, if I disable ACPI support then shouldn't I be able to use
IRQ 9 for other things? If so, shouldn't the kernel to refrain
from reserving this IRQ?
Thomas Hood
jdthood_AT_yahoo.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
