On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Add valid patch size for family 16h processors
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Is this something that needs to go to -stable ?
> #define F1XH_MPB_MAX_SIZE 2048
> #define F14H_MPB_MAX_SIZE 1824
> #define F15H_MPB_MAX_SIZE 4096
> +#define F16H_MPB_MAX_SIZE 3458
>
> switch (c->x86) {
> case 0x14:
> @@ -198,6 +199,9 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(int cpu, u32
> patch_size,
> case 0x15:
> max_size = F15H_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
> break;
> + case 0x16:
> + max_size = F16H_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
> + break;
> default:
> max_size = F1XH_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
> break;
Because it looks like without this patch, some valid microcode updates
would be rejected by the kernel...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
