On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging > > becomes > > > > > > 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3? Patches 1-3 > > I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3. >
Yes. > > 2. Stats for migration? Patches 4-6 > > 3. Common NUMA infrastructure? Patches 7-21 > > 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits Patches 22-35 > > > > Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this > > stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the > > scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the > > above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35. > > > > Peter, Ingo, Andrea? > > The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an > ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion. > Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
