On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:28:03PM +0000, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote:
> 
> Thanks Alan.
> 
> > The second error check is unreachable because the lock function isn't 
> > assigned
> > to ret
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Ramakrishna Pallala <[email protected]>

For some reason I don't have the original patch in my mailbox. I wonder if
I have not been Cc'ed on this one or it got lost...

Anyway, I reconstructed it by hand and applied, thanks a lot!

Anton.

> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/power/max17042_battery.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> > b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> > index 74abc6c..73b432d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> > @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int max17042_init_chip(struct max17042_chip
> > *chip)
> >                     __func__);
> >             return -EIO;
> >     }
> > -   max17042_verify_model_lock(chip);
> > +   ret = max17042_verify_model_lock(chip);
> >     if (ret) {
> >             dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "%s lock verify failed\n",
> >                     __func__);
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to