On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 18:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, November 19, 2012 09:16:52 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:06 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:51 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 00:56 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > is acpi_bus.h really the right file for these prototypes?
> > > > This interface is limited for ACPI, so it should be declared in a header
> > > > file under include/acpi.  Among the files in this directory, acpi_bus.h
> > > > seems to be a good fit as it declares the interfaces provided by ACPI
> > > > core.
> > > 
> > > I'd've put them in acpi.h or maybe created acpi_utils.h 
> > 
> > Hi Joe,
> > 
> > We cannot use acpi.h since it is an ACPICA header.
> 
> Which acpi.h are you referring to?


I was referring "include/acpi/acpi.h".

Thanks,
-Toshi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to