On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:43:49AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 14:29 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> 
> > This all looks sensible, though we still have three blocks doing the
> > same thing.  How about we standardise this check into a single check,
> > generating the capacity from the matched name.
> []
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > +                   if ($line =~ 
> > /\b(kfree|usb_free_urb|debugfs_remove(?:_recursive)?)$expr/) {
> > +                           my $func = $1;
> > +                           my $func_capacity = "NEEDLESS_$1";
> > +
> > +                           $func_capacity =~ s/(.$)/\U$1\E/;
> > +
> > +                           WARN($func_capacity,
> > +                                "$func(NULL) is safe this check is 
> > probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
> 
> Perhaps just
>                               WARN("NEEDLESS_IF",

I would cirtainly be happy with that, I was trying to avoid changing the
capacity for the existing NEEDLESS_KFREE.  If compatibility there isn't
an issue then that makes life even simpler.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to