On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, William T Wilson wrote: > it seems to me that in 2.2.x it looks like this: > > total usage == swap + RAM > under 2.4.x it looks like: > total usage == swap total usage == maximum(swap, ram) Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? Mike Harrold
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? Rik van Riel
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? christophe barbe
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? Rik van Riel
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thi... christophe barbe
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thi... James Lewis Nance
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent... Rik van Riel
- kernel benchmark gis88530
- RE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? Torrey Hoffman
- RE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? William T Wilson
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? Rik van Riel
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thi... LA Walsh
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent... Rik van Riel
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thi... Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent... Rik van Riel
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a perm... Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thi... Boris Pisarcik
- Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent... Alexander Viro