On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> The idea behind these patches is to move SoC-specific pin control code from > arch/ to drivers/pinctrl/ and use the Linux device model to instantiate the > pin control device. This is required to add device tree support for the pin > control device. Ah, this looks nice :-) > The SH7264 and SH7269 platforms have no gpiolib support so the PFC code can't > be compiled for them. As the currently implemented arch-level pinmux support > also depends on generic GPIO, we're moving from a situation where the code > isn't used to a different situation where the code isn't used. I don't > consider that as a regression. That's OK, would be nice to get rid of this one day though. I will try to go through and review patches individually. I'll focus on pinctrl/GPIO mechanisms and trust you and Paul M to know that the SH side of things are correct. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/