3.5.7u1 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com>

commit 8636ea672f0c5ab7478c42c5b6705ebd1db7eb6a upstream.

The ceph_fault() function takes the con mutex, so we should avoid
dropping it before calling it.  This fixes a potential race with
another thread calling ceph_con_close(), or _open(), or similar (we
don't reverify con->state after retaking the lock).

Add annotation so that lockdep realizes we will drop the mutex before
returning.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <el...@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesin...@canonical.com>
---
 net/ceph/messenger.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index feb5a2a..c3b628c 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -2336,7 +2336,6 @@ done_unlocked:
        return;
 
 fault:
-       mutex_unlock(&con->mutex);
        ceph_fault(con);     /* error/fault path */
        goto done_unlocked;
 }
@@ -2347,9 +2346,8 @@ fault:
  * exponential backoff
  */
 static void ceph_fault(struct ceph_connection *con)
+       __releases(con->mutex)
 {
-       mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
-
        pr_err("%s%lld %s %s\n", ENTITY_NAME(con->peer_name),
               ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr), con->error_msg);
        dout("fault %p state %lu to peer %s\n",
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to