On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:19:01PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > >> Consider the following sequence of operations for a hotplugged memory
> > >> device:
> > >>
> > >> 1. echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> > >> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> > >>
> > >> If we don't offline/remove the memory, we have no chance to do it in
> > >> step 2. After
> > >> step2, the memory is used by the kernel, but we have powered off it. It
> > >> is very
> > >> dangerous.
> > >
> > > How does power-off happen after unbind? acpi_eject_store checks for
> > > existing
> > > driver before taking any action:
> > >
> > > #ifndef FORCE_EJECT
> > > if (acpi_device->driver == NULL) {
> > > ret = -ENODEV;
> > > goto err;
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > FORCE_EJECT is not defined afaict, so the function returns without
> > > scheduling
> > > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device. Is there another code path that calls
> > > power-off?
> >
> > Consider the following case:
> >
> > We hotremove the memory device by SCI and unbind it from the driver at the
> > same time:
> >
> > CPUa CPUb
> > acpi_memory_device_notify()
> > unbind it from the driver
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
>
> Can we make acpi_bus_remove() to fail if a given acpi_device is not
> bound with a driver? If so, can we make the unbind operation to perform
> unbind only?
acpi_bus_remove_device could check if the driver is present, and return -ENODEV
if it's not present (dev->driver == NULL).
But there can still be a race between an eject and an unbind operation happening
simultaneously. This seems like a general problem to me i.e. not specific to an
acpi memory device. How do we ensure an eject does not race with a driver unbind
for other acpi devices?
Is there a per-device lock in acpi-core or device-core that can prevent this
from
happening? Driver core does a device_lock(dev) on all operations, but this is
probably not grabbed on SCI-initiated acpi ejects.
thanks,
- Vasilis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
