On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 10:23 -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> yes, but dont call it 8/7 since that doesnt make sense.

It made enough sense when it was a single patch appended to a thread of
7 other patches from Krzysztof. But now it's all got a little more
complex, so I've tried to collect together the latest version of
everything we've discussed:

 http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/atm.git
  git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/atm.git

David Woodhouse (5):
      solos-pci: Wait for pending TX to complete when releasing vcc
      br2684: don't send frames on not-ready vcc
      atm: Add release_cb() callback to vcc
      pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm_send()
      br2684: fix module_put() race

Krzysztof Mazur (6):
      atm: add owner of push() callback to atmvcc
      pppoatm: allow assign only on a connected socket
      pppoatm: fix module_put() race
      pppoatm: take ATM socket lock in pppoatm_send()
      pppoatm: drop frames to not-ready vcc
      pppoatm: do not inline pppoatm_may_send()


-- 
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to