Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author: Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > It was just a simple test machine where it didn't matter what was lost. > Still that doesn't justify this behaviour. > Then use a journalling filesystem. If not, give it a few minutes of idle time; fsck will complain on boot but it should be able to clean up the mess. -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux should better cope... Brian Gerst
- Re: Linux should better cope... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: Linux should better ... Ben Ford
- Re: Linux should better cope with po... Werner Almesberger
- Re: Linux should better cope with power f... William T Wilson
- RE: Linux should better cope with power f... Torrey Hoffman
- RE: Linux should better cope with po... Stephen Satchell
- RE: Linux should better cope wit... Andre Hedrick
- RE: Linux should better cope with power f... Stephen Gutknecht (linux-kernel)
- Re: Linux should better cope with po... Otto Wyss
- Re: Linux should better cope wit... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux should better cope with power f... Otto Wyss
- Re: Linux should better cope with po... John R Lenton
- Re: Linux should better cope with power f... David Balazic
- Re: Linux should better cope with po... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Linux should better cope wit... David Balazic
- Re: Linux should better cope with po... Otto Wyss
- Re: Linux should better cope wit... David Ford
- Re: Linux should better cope... Otto Wyss
- Re: Linux should better ... David Ford
- Re: Linux should be... Otto Wyss