Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > Is this really needed? For the large majority of the stable > patches, specifically enumerating this isn't a big deal, it's a tiny > patch, and if you think I'll remember to tell you which specific > clause you didn't follow, then you think I have more spare time than > I really do.
Yeah, it was largely tongue-in-cheek. :) Although a hint of "not upstream" would have been helpful. You obviously have the checklist in your head, and you (presumably) have a your formletter automated; it just seems that, as busy as the maintainers are, trading an extra 2s of your time for an hour of a contributor's time would sometimes be the right thing. Regardless, you're the one doing the work, not me. (And you're an outright angel, compared to some other high-level maintainers, so I should simply count myself lucky.) > Sorry, but no, I don't think this patch is ok, especially that S15 > clause, nice try :) Can't fault a guy for trying. (Or, hopefully, can't fault him much...) Have a good weekend, t. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
