3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>

commit 8ffeb9b0e6369135bf03a073514f571ef10606b9 upstream.

In get_sample_period(), unsigned long is not enough:

  watchdog_thresh * 2 * (NSEC_PER_SEC / 5)

case1:
  watchdog_thresh is 10 by default, the sample value will be: 0xEE6B2800

case2:
 set watchdog_thresh is 20, the sample value will be: 0x1 DCD6 5000

In case2, we need use u64 to express the sample period.  Otherwise,
changing the threshold thru proc often can not be successful.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/watchdog.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static unsigned long get_timestamp(int t
        return cpu_clock(this_cpu) >> 30LL;  /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
 }
 
-static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
+static u64 get_sample_period(void)
 {
        /*
         * convert watchdog_thresh from seconds to ns
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(v
         * increment before the hardlockup detector generates
         * a warning
         */
-       return get_softlockup_thresh() * (NSEC_PER_SEC / 5);
+       return get_softlockup_thresh() * ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC / 5);
 }
 
 /* Commands for resetting the watchdog */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to