> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwbo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 6:26 PM > To: Deucher, Alexander > Cc: Ben Hutchings; Greg KH; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > sta...@vger.kernel.org; a...@linux-foundation.org; > a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk > Subject: Re: [ 67/89] drm/radeon: properly track the crtc not_enabled case > evergreen_mc_stop() > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Deucher, Alexander > <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwbo...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:25 AM > >> To: Ben Hutchings; Greg KH > >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux- > >> foundation.org; a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; Deucher, Alexander > >> Subject: Re: [ 67/89] drm/radeon: properly track the crtc not_enabled > case > >> evergreen_mc_stop() > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> > >> wrote: > >> > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > >> > > >> > ------------------ > >> > > >> > From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > >> > > >> > commit 804cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 upstream. > >> > > >> > The save struct is not initialized previously so explicitly > >> > mark the crtcs as not used when they are not in use. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> > >> > >> Hm. If this is needed in 3.2, presumably it's needed in 3.6 as well. I > >> don't see it queued for 3.6.9, and the Cc: tag is there. > >> > >> Greg, Alex, was this just something that was missed, or am I wrong about > >> it needing to go into 3.6? > > > > The original patches should go into 3.6 kernels as well: > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4 > a15903db02026728d0cf2755c6fabae16b8db6a > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=6 > 2444b7462a2b98bc78d68736c03a7c4e66ba7e2 > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8 > 04cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 > > > > I've been meaning to follow up on it, but I haven't had the time. Do I need > to send explicit patches to stable@vger or can I just ask the above commits > be cherrypicked to 3.6? > > > > Normally the CC tag works. Not entirely sure why it didn't for the one > patch I asked about. The other two commits you've highlighted here are > lacking any sort of stable tag, so you'd have to pipe up here about them.
The patches were not initially a bug fix per se, so I didn't cc stable. It was only later that I got reports of the patches fixing issues for some people. Normally I add the stable cc if the patch is a bug fix. > > I went ahead and tried the cherry-pick myself on top of 3.6.9, in the > order you specified above. The 62444b7462a has a trivial conflict coming > back. I've attached an mbox with these three patches. If you want to > give them a glance over and OK them, that would be great. They look good to me. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > > (Apologies for the attachment. Gmail is going to mess it up otherwise.) > > I have them building locally at the moment on top of 3.6.9 and don't > expect many issues, but I can't personally test the fixes myself. > > josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
