> > Ok, I understand. I will write something like this. > > > > * Copyright (C) 2012 ST Microelectronics > > * author: Federico Vaga <federico.v...@gmail.com> > > * Copyright (C) 2010 WindRiver Systems, Inc. > > * authors: Andreas Kies <andreas.k...@windriver.com> > > * Vlad Lungu <vlad.lu...@windriver.com> > > Sounds perfect to me.
I will answer to this with a patch > As you said, the best place to discuss about it is likely at LKML. > [...] > Btw, this is why it is called "git blame", and not "git authorship": > it is a tool to identify who was the last one that modified the code. > Its main usage is to identify who might have introduced a bug on the > code. I know I know, it was just a stupid example to expose the problem that I have in my mind. I know that it is very difficult (impossible?) to assign the authorship of a single line, and git blame it is not the tool to do this :) I think you understand what I mean despite the stupid example -- Federico Vaga -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
