On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:47:49PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hillarious!
> >
> > Andrew, would you please pick up Alan's patch? It clearly fixes an
> > ancient bug in the pnpacpi code.
>
> And yes btw we should turn this option on in -next, and get these sort of
> things out of the tree for good. More importantly it'll mean anyone
> adding another one gets a whine on the spot.
Right,
when we added W=, we thought that one use case would be for devs to
use it when build-testing patches and check whether they're adding new
warnings.
However, (1) we need additional functionality in some script to be able
to test when the build log adds new warnings
and
(2) need someone to enforce it.
I think Geert is doing something like that but I'm not sure he's even
using W=.
Actually, it would be cool if something checked for new warnings, mapped
it back to the patch in linux-next adding that warning and then nags the
patch author endlessly until it is fixed.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
