On Thu, 06 Dec 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 6 December 2012 16:42, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > I thought we'd be over this? The 'ID' will be represented by the > > address of the chip i.e. stmpe1601@40, where '40' will be > > distinguishing factor? > > I haven't tested it but i thought we are getting i2c device name from > modalias() fn running on "st,stmpe1601" and so would give us "stmpe1601". > > Now, i went back to your earlier mail and checked device name: > stmpe-i2c 0-0040: stmpe1601 detected, chip id: 0x212 > > It came from DT :) > > So, probably no more issues of id's. Will resend my patch, after getting > rid of tables.
Now we're talking! -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
