On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Henrik Rydberg <rydb...@euromail.se> wrote:
>>
>> Henrik, does that - corrected - patch (*instead* of the previous one,
>> not in addition to) also fix your issue?
>
> Yes - I can no longer trigger the failpath, so it seems to work. Mel,
> enjoy the rest of the talk. ;-)
>
> Generally, I am a bit surprised that noone hit this before, given that
> it was quite easy to trigger. I will check 3.6 as well.
Actually, looking at it some more, I think that two-liner patch had
*ANOTHER* bug.
Because the other line seems buggy as well.
Instead of
end_pfn = ALIGN(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, pageblock_nr_pages);
I think it should be
end_pfn = ALIGN(pfn+1, pageblock_nr_pages);
instead. ALIGN() already aligns upwards (but the "+1" is needed in
case pfn is already at a pageblock_nr_pages boundary, at which point
ALIGN() would have just returned that same boundary.
Hmm? Mel, please confirm. And Henrik, it might be good to test that
doubly-fixed patch. Because reading the patch and trying to fix bugs
in it that way is *not* the same as actually verifying it ;)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
