3.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>

commit 6bdd253f635f7b2ef027d116933a6c9ec148b87f upstream.

Felix Liao reported that when an interface is set DOWN
while another interface is executing a ROC, the warning
in ieee80211_start_next_roc() (about the first item on
the list having started already) triggers.

This is because ieee80211_roc_purge() calls it even if
it never actually changed the list of ROC items. To fix
this, simply remove the function call. If it is needed
then it will be done by the ieee80211_sw_roc_work()
function when the ROC item that is being removed while
active is cleaned up.

Reported-by: Felix Liao <felix.l...@watchguard.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linvi...@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/mac80211/offchannel.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
@@ -453,8 +453,6 @@ void ieee80211_roc_purge(struct ieee8021
                list_move_tail(&roc->list, &tmp_list);
                roc->abort = true;
        }
-
-       ieee80211_start_next_roc(local);
        mutex_unlock(&local->mtx);
 
        list_for_each_entry_safe(roc, tmp, &tmp_list, list) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to