Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 7 ++ > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_regs.h | 33 --------- > arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 132 > +--------------------------------- > arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 89 +---------------------- > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 3 + > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 33 +++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 132 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 8 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-) > > What are these changes - it seems perf and KVM related.
Only in passing. The header files you indicated are marked as being exported to userspace in Kbuild - therefore they get disintegrated around __KERNEL__ conditionals just like all the other UAPI-relevant headers. > Is the latest version above 100% bug-free, with no known > problems whatsoever? It builds perf for me. No idea if perf works, I've never used it. I waved a branch including the patch on top of all my perf patches towards Arnaldo and others, but I don't know if they've tried it. I've also checked that x86_64 allyesconfig and i386 allmodconfig build and that an x86_64 kernel built with my test machine's usual config builds and boots. So, no known problems. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
