On 22 Mar 2001, Kevin Buhr wrote: > Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > 2.4.2.ac20.virgin 2.4.3-pre6 > > real 11m0.708s 11m58.617s > > user 15m8.720s 7m29.970s > > sys 1m31.410s 0m41.590s > > > > It looks like ac20 is doing some double accounting. [snip] > Mike, would you like to try out the following (untested) patch against > vanilla ac20 to see if it does the trick? Yes, that fixed it. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge ... Jakob Østergaard
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 700% ... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 7... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap area... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 7... Kurt Garloff
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap area... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap... Kevin Buhr
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge ... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge ... Kevin Buhr
- 2.4.2-ac20 patch for process ti... Mike Galbraith
- 2.4.2-ac20 patch for process ti... Kevin Buhr
- Re: 2.4.2-ac20 patch for proces... Mike Galbraith
- Re: 2.4.2-ac20 patch for proces... Kevin Buhr
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 700% slowdown. Jakob Østergaard
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 700% slowdown. Dieter Nützel
- Re: Linux 2.4.2 fails to merge mmap areas, 700% slowdown. Zack Weinberg