On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 20:19 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: >> When we are trying to push task out, no point to select the last cpu that >> the given task executed on, which is fixed by selecting target cpu with >> cache affinity concerned, and with SD_WAKE_AFFINE ignored as we are not >> handling sleeper. > > I have to ask. Why? > > The check you are skipping is if the task is running on a CPU that is > already the lowest CPU priority (lowest_mask returns the CPUs running > tasks of the lowest priority in the system).
Hm ... how do you get the lowest mask for a pushable task iff that check makes sense? > Which means that either the > task that we are pushing is the same priority or lesser priority than > what is running on the other CPUs. Either case, this task wont push out > a task on the other CPUs because it's not higher priority than those > tasks. > > You just added more work for the same result (no push). > > -- Steve > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
