Hello, Srivatsa. On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:43:54PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > This approach (of using synchronize_sched()) also looks good. It is simple, > yet effective, but unfortunately inefficient at the writer side (because > he'll have to wait for a full synchronize_sched()).
While synchornize_sched() is heavier on the writer side than the originally posted version, it doesn't stall the whole machine and wouldn't introduce latencies to others. Shouldn't that be enough? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
