> That depends what you mean by "must not". If it's your missile guidance > system, aircraft autopilot or life support system, the system must not run > out of memory in the first place. If the system breaks down badly, killing > init and thus panicking (hence rebooting, if the system is set up that > way) seems the best approach. Ultra reliable systems dont contain memory allocators. There are good reasons for this but the design trade offs are rather hard to make in a real world environment Solving the trivial overcommit case is not a difficult task but since I don't believe it is needed I'll wait for those who moan so loudly to do it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Adding just a pinch of icache/dc... Jan Harkes
- Re: Adding just a pinch of icach... Andi Kleen
- Re: Adding just a pinch of icach... Jan Harkes
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Guest section DW
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Jesse Pollard
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... José Luis Domingo López
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Anthony de Boer - USEnet
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init James A. Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing ini... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH] OOM handling Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Martin Dalecki