On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Bill Wendling wrote: > Also sprach Alan Cox: > > } > - default: > } > + default:; > } > } Agree - done > } > This kind of coding makes me want to cry. What's so wrong with: > > default: > break; > > instead? The ';' is hard to notice and I agree. I'd much prefer that syntax also. Or just remove the "default:" altogether, when it doesn't make any difference. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Bill Wendling
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Horst von Brand