On 14 December 2012 15:09, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> There is no need to check the callback_required parameter, due to we check the
> callback pointer to be a non-NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> index 92f33af..3c8acfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ dwc_descriptor_complete(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, struct 
> dw_desc *desc,
>
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>
> -       if (callback_required && callback)
> +       if (callback)
>                 callback(param);
>  }

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to