There is a race condition between creating a gpio or gpiochip device and adding
default attributes. This patch fixes this by defining the default attributes as
dev_attrs of the class. For this, it was necessary to create a separate
gpiochip_class besides gpio_class.

Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <sti...@antcom.de>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio |   11 ++++
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c               |   79 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
+++ linux-2.6/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
@@ -20,6 +20,17 @@ Description:
            /value ... always readable, writes fail for input GPIOs
            /direction ... r/w as: in, out (default low); write: high, low
            /edge ... r/w as: none, falling, rising, both
+
+What:          /sys/class/gpiochip/
+Date:          October 2012
+KernelVersion: 3.7
+Contact:       Roland Stigge <sti...@antcom.de>
+Description:
+
+  Each gpiochip is represented by a separate device having the following
+  attributes:
+
+    /sys/class/gpiochip
        /gpiochipN ... for each gpiochip; #N is its first GPIO
            /base ... (r/o) same as N
            /label ... (r/o) descriptive, not necessarily unique
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -334,9 +334,6 @@ static ssize_t gpio_value_store(struct d
        return status;
 }
 
-static const DEVICE_ATTR(value, 0644,
-               gpio_value_show, gpio_value_store);
-
 static irqreturn_t gpio_sysfs_irq(int irq, void *priv)
 {
        struct sysfs_dirent     *value_sd = priv;
@@ -557,19 +554,6 @@ static ssize_t gpio_active_low_store(str
        return status ? : size;
 }
 
-static const DEVICE_ATTR(active_low, 0644,
-               gpio_active_low_show, gpio_active_low_store);
-
-static const struct attribute *gpio_attrs[] = {
-       &dev_attr_value.attr,
-       &dev_attr_active_low.attr,
-       NULL,
-};
-
-static const struct attribute_group gpio_attr_group = {
-       .attrs = (struct attribute **) gpio_attrs,
-};
-
 /*
  * /sys/class/gpio/gpiochipN/
  *   /base ... matching gpio_chip.base (N)
@@ -584,7 +568,6 @@ static ssize_t chip_base_show(struct dev
 
        return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", chip->base);
 }
-static DEVICE_ATTR(base, 0444, chip_base_show, NULL);
 
 static ssize_t chip_label_show(struct device *dev,
                               struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -593,7 +576,6 @@ static ssize_t chip_label_show(struct de
 
        return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", chip->label ? : "");
 }
-static DEVICE_ATTR(label, 0444, chip_label_show, NULL);
 
 static ssize_t chip_ngpio_show(struct device *dev,
                               struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -602,18 +584,6 @@ static ssize_t chip_ngpio_show(struct de
 
        return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", chip->ngpio);
 }
-static DEVICE_ATTR(ngpio, 0444, chip_ngpio_show, NULL);
-
-static const struct attribute *gpiochip_attrs[] = {
-       &dev_attr_base.attr,
-       &dev_attr_label.attr,
-       &dev_attr_ngpio.attr,
-       NULL,
-};
-
-static const struct attribute_group gpiochip_attr_group = {
-       .attrs = (struct attribute **) gpiochip_attrs,
-};
 
 /*
  * /sys/class/gpio/export ... write-only
@@ -692,11 +662,32 @@ static struct class_attribute gpio_class
        __ATTR_NULL,
 };
 
+static struct device_attribute gpio_attrs[] = {
+       __ATTR(active_low, 0644, gpio_active_low_show, gpio_active_low_store),
+       __ATTR(value, 0644, gpio_value_show, gpio_value_store),
+       __ATTR_NULL,
+};
+
 static struct class gpio_class = {
        .name =         "gpio",
        .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
 
-       .class_attrs =  gpio_class_attrs,
+       .class_attrs = gpio_class_attrs,
+       .dev_attrs = gpio_attrs,
+};
+
+static struct device_attribute gpiochip_attrs[] = {
+       __ATTR(label, 0444, chip_label_show, NULL),
+       __ATTR(base, 0444, chip_base_show, NULL),
+       __ATTR(ngpio, 0444, chip_ngpio_show, NULL),
+       __ATTR_NULL,
+};
+
+static struct class gpiochip_class = {
+       .name =         "gpiochip",
+       .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
+
+       .dev_attrs =    gpiochip_attrs,
 };
 
 
@@ -753,10 +744,7 @@ int gpio_export(unsigned gpio, bool dire
                dev = device_create(&gpio_class, desc->chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
                                desc, ioname ? ioname : "gpio%u", gpio);
                if (!IS_ERR(dev)) {
-                       status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj,
-                                               &gpio_attr_group);
-
-                       if (!status && direction_may_change)
+                       if (direction_may_change)
                                status = device_create_file(dev,
                                                &dev_attr_direction);
 
@@ -926,25 +914,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_unexport);
 
 static int gpiochip_export(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-       int             status;
+       int             status = 0;
        struct device   *dev;
 
        /* Many systems register gpio chips for SOC support very early,
         * before driver model support is available.  In those cases we
         * export this later, in gpiolib_sysfs_init() ... here we just
-        * verify that _some_ field of gpio_class got initialized.
+        * verify that _some_ field of gpiochip_class got initialized.
         */
-       if (!gpio_class.p)
+       if (!gpiochip_class.p)
                return 0;
 
        /* use chip->base for the ID; it's already known to be unique */
        mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
-       dev = device_create(&gpio_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
-                               "gpiochip%d", chip->base);
-       if (!IS_ERR(dev)) {
-               status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj,
-                               &gpiochip_attr_group);
-       } else
+       dev = device_create(&gpiochip_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
+                           "gpiochip%d", chip->base);
+       if (IS_ERR(dev))
                status = PTR_ERR(dev);
        chip->exported = (status == 0);
        mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
@@ -972,7 +957,7 @@ static void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpi
        struct device           *dev;
 
        mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
-       dev = class_find_device(&gpio_class, NULL, chip, match_export);
+       dev = class_find_device(&gpiochip_class, NULL, chip, match_export);
        if (dev) {
                put_device(dev);
                device_unregister(dev);
@@ -1229,6 +1214,10 @@ static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(voi
        if (status < 0)
                return status;
 
+       status = class_register(&gpiochip_class);
+       if (status < 0)
+               return status;
+
        status = class_register(&gpio_block_class);
        if (status < 0)
                return status;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to