Re: Interesting post from the MC project to linux-kernel. :block while spinlock held...

[Ishikawa]

Hello Garloff-san, Actually, a good question. I have been trying to find the details of the verification tool from stanford but to no avail. Maybe we should ask the posters from the Stanford directly. (Oops. I thought I posted this to linux-scsi, but did I post linux-kernel instead? Apologies.) Kurt Garloff wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:24:56AM +0900, Chiaki Ishikawa wrote: > > --- begin quote --- > > > enclosed are 163 potential bugs in 2.4.1 where blocking functions are > > > called with either interrupts disabled or a spin lock held. The > > > checker works by: > > > > Here's the file manifest. Apologies. > > > > drivers/atm/idt77105.c > > drivers/atm/iphase.c > > drivers/atm/uPD98402.c > > drivers/block/cciss.c > > drivers/block/cpqarray.c > > drivers/char/applicom.c > > ... > > drivers/scsi/aha1542.c <--- some scsi files > > drivers/scsi/atp870u.c <---- > > drivers/scsi/psi240i.c <---- > > drivers/scsi/sym53c416.c <---- > > drivers/scsi/tmscsim.c <---- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > How do I fond about about details? > > R - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/