On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:14:50AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> > Wait a minute.  get_user_pages() relies on ->mmap_sem being held.  Unless
>> > I'm seriously misreading your patch it removes that protection.  And yes,
>> > I'm aware of execve-related exception; it's in special circumstances -
>> > bprm->mm is guaranteed to be not shared (and we need to rearchitect that
>> > area anyway, but that's a separate story).
>>
>> Unless I completely screwed up the patch, ->mmap_sem is still held for
>> read (it's downgraded from write).  It's just not held for write
>> anymore.
>
> Huh?  I'm talking about the call of get_user_pages() in aio_setup_ring().
> With your patch it's done completely outside of ->mmap_sem, isn't it?

Oh, /that/ call to get_user_pages.  That would qualify as screwing up...

Since dropping and reacquiring mmap_sem there is probably a bad idea
there, I'll rework this and post a v2.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to