On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 11:07 +0900, Hiraku Toyooka wrote: > Hi, Steven, > > (2012/11/30 23:17), Steven Rostedt wrote: > [snip] > > > > Actually, I would have: > > > > status\input | 0 | 1 | else | > > --------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > not allocated |(do nothing)| alloc+swap | EINVAL | > > --------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > allocated | free | swap | clear | > > --------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > > > Perhaps we don't need to do the clear on swap, just let the trace > > continue where it left off? But in case we should swap... > > > > I think we don't need the clear on swap too. > I'll update my patches like this table. > > > There's a fast way to clear the tracer. Look at what the wakeup tracer > > does. We can make that generic. If you want, I can write that code up > > too. Hmm, maybe I'll do that, as it will speed things up for > > everyone :-) > > >
BTW, any update on this? I really like to get this into 3.9. Thanks! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
