On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult >>> >>> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with >>> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct >>> clk_hw *hw, >>> unsigned long parent_rate) >>> { >>> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); >>> + unsigned long long int rate; >>> >>> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; >>> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; >>> + do_div(rate, fix->div); >>> + return (unsigned long)rate; >>> } >>> >>> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >>> -- >>> 1.7.10.4 >>> >> >> Correct Mike's email address. > > Any comments? Does it mean that nobody want to fix the bug?
Thanks for the patch. My apologies for letting this one slip through the cracks but my normal email workflow was unavoidably disrupted and I find myself playing catch-up with pending patches. The patch looks good to me but I'll change the $SUBJECT to "clk: fixed-factor: round_rate should use do_div" and do some testing before taking it in. Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
