On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:12:33PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > A swappiness of 0 has a slightly different meaning for global reclaim > (may swap if file cache really low) and memory cgroup reclaim (never > swap, ever). > > In addition, global reclaim at highest priority will scan all LRU > lists equal to their size and ignore other balancing heuristics. > UNLESS swappiness forbids swapping, then the lists are balanced based > on recent reclaim effectiveness. UNLESS file cache is running low, > then anonymous pages are force-scanned. > > This (total mess of a) behaviour is implicit and not obvious from the > way the code is organized. At least make it apparent in the code flow > and document the conditions. It will be it easier to come up with > sane semantics later. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
