On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest, running latest
> > linux-next kernel, I've
> > stumbled on the following:
> >
> > [ 127.959264] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > 0000000000000110
> > [ 127.960379] IP: [<ffffffff81185b60>] __lock_acquire+0xb0/0xa90
...
> > 88 e9 b9 09 00 00 90 <48> 81 3b 60 59 22 86 b8 01 00 00 00 44 0f 44 e8 41
> > 83 fc 01 77
> > [ 127.978032] RIP [<ffffffff81185b60>] __lock_acquire+0xb0/0xa90
> > [ 127.978032] RSP <ffff8800137abb78>
> > [ 127.978032] CR2: 0000000000000110
> > [ 127.978032] ---[ end trace 3dc1b0c5db8c1230 ]---
> >
> > The relevant piece of code is:
> >
> > static struct page *get_mergeable_page(struct rmap_item *rmap_item)
> > {
> > struct mm_struct *mm = rmap_item->mm;
> > unsigned long addr = rmap_item->address;
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > struct page *page;
> >
> > down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >
> > Where 'mm' is NULL. I'm not really sure how it happens though.
>
> Thanks, yes, I got that, and it's not peculiar to fuzzing at all:
> I'm testing the fix at the moment, but just hit something else too
> (ksmd oops on NULL p->mm in task_numa_fault i.e. task_numa_placement).
>
> For the moment, you're safer not to run KSM: configure it out or don't
> set it to run. Fixes to follow later, I'll try to remember to Cc you.
>
Hello all,
I've also tried fuzzing with trinity inside of kvm guest when tested KSM
patch, but applied on top of 3.7-rc8, but didn't trigger that oops. So
going to do the same testing on linux-next.
Hugh, does it seem like bug in unstable_tree_search_insert() you mentioned
in yesterday email of something else?
Thank you for your testing && feedback!
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
