On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:10:54PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: [...] > > > + .read_vl = pcf8523_rtc_read_vl, > > > > What tree is this based on? None of the trees I have contains .read_vl > > in rtc_class_ops. > > Hm, I've tested this against a local 3.4 kernel since that is what my > device had, I didn't realize that we already had some local changes for > the voltage low stuff. > > I'm guessing the right way is to do it as the pcf8563 in the mainline kernel, > I'll respin my patch and resend.
From a quick search through the mainline kernel history, there's no trace of this field. Thierry
pgpM6LRwasIGB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
