On Thu, Dec 20 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> index a92061e..4ada4ef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,25 @@
> #ifndef __LINUX_PAGEISOLATION_H
> #define __LINUX_PAGEISOLATION_H
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION
> +static inline bool page_isolated_pageblock(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_ISOLATE;
> +}
> +static inline bool mt_isolated_pageblock(int migratetype)
> +{
> + return migratetype == MIGRATE_ISOLATE;
> +}
Perhaps “is_migrate_isolate” to match already existing “is_migrate_cma”?
Especially as the “mt_isolated_pageblock” sound confusing to me, it
implies that it works on pageblocks which it does not.
> +#else
> +static inline bool page_isolated_pageblock(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +static inline bool mt_isolated_pageblock(int migratetype)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
pgph8cives84r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
