On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Matthew Wilcox writes: > > people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit processor. > This whole "64-bit" fallacy has got to stop. Indeed. > Now it is "anybody who needs > 2TB disk should use a 64-bit CPU", soon > to be wrong. It was already wrong in 1995. -Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jes Sorensen
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Manfred Spraul
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Dan Hollis
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jonathan Morton
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jan Harkes
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jan Harkes
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Jesse Pollard