>> @@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq,
>> unsigned long this_load,
>> void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
>> {
>> unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
>> - unsigned long load = this_rq->load.weight;
>> + unsigned long load = (unsigned long)this_rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
>
> So shouldn't this line be guarded with CONFIG_SMP too?
Thanks reminder. Yes, I already found this problem and plan to resend
the patch base on latest tree.
>
> Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
