Hello,
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The culprit commit here seems to be...
> >
> > commit 9650388b5c56578fdccc79c57a8c82fb92b8e7f1
> > Author: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> > Date: Fri Dec 21 07:32:10 2012 +0000
> >
> > ipv4: arp: fix a lockdep splat in arp_solicit()
>
> Can you try the following one-line fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ------------>
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> index 1169ed4..75e0d7c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> pr_debug("trying to ucast probe in NUD_INVALID\n");
> neigh_ha_snapshot(dst_ha, neigh, dev);
> } else {
> - memset(dst_ha, 0, dev->addr_len);
> + memcpy(dst_ha, dev->broadcast, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
Use dev->addr_len instead of MAX_ADDR_LEN or
better provide NULL ptr to arp_send as before the
"ipv4: arp: fix a lockdep splat in arp_solicit" change,
for example by keeping dst_ha as pointer and using another
name for the temp array that is now dst_ha[MAX_ADDR_LEN].
> probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes;
> if (probes < 0) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
